首页> 外文OA文献 >Costs and Effects of an Ambulatory Geriatric Unit (the AGe-FIT Study) : A Randomized Controlled Trial
【2h】

Costs and Effects of an Ambulatory Geriatric Unit (the AGe-FIT Study) : A Randomized Controlled Trial

机译:动态老年病科的费用和影响(AGe-FIT研究):随机对照试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To examine costs and effects of care based on comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) provided by an ambulatory geriatric care unit (AGU) in addition to usual care. DESIGN: Assessor-blinded, single-center randomized controlled trial. SETTING: AGU in an acute hospital in southeastern Sweden. PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling individuals aged 75 years or older who had received inpatient hospital care 3 or more times in the past 12 months and had 3 or more concomitant medical diagnoses were eligible for study inclusion and randomized to the intervention group (IG; n = 208) or control group (CG; n = 174). Mean age (SD) was 82.5 (4.9) years. INTERVENTION: Participants in the IG received CGA-based care at the AGU in addition to usual care. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was number of hospitalizations. Secondary outcomes were days in hospital and nursing home, mortality, cost of public health and social care, participant' sense of security in care, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). RESULTS: Baseline characteristics did not differ between groups. The number of hospitalizations did not differ between the IG (2.1) and CG (2.4), but the number of inpatient days was lower in the IG (11.1 vs 15.2; P = .035). The IG showed trends of reduced mortality (hazard ratio 1.51; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.988-2.310; P = .057) and an increased sense of security in care interaction. No difference in HRQoL was observed. Costs for the IG and CG were 33,371£ (39,947£) and 30,490£ (31,568£; P = .432). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study of CGA-based care was performed in an ambulatory care setting, in contrast to the greater part of studies of the effects of CGA, which have been conducted in hospital settings. This study confirms the superiority of this type of care to elderly people in terms of days in hospital and sense of security in care interaction and that a shift to more accessible care for older people with multimorbidity is possible without increasing costs. This study can aid the planning of future interventions for older people. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01446757.
机译:目的:除了常规护理外,还应根据由门诊老年病护理部门(AGU)提供的综合老年医学评估(CGA)来检查护理的成本和效果。设计:评估者盲,单中心随机对照试验。地点:AGU在瑞典东南部的一家急诊医院。参加者:过去12个月内接受过3次或以上住院治疗且有3次或以上伴随医学诊断的75岁或75岁以上的社区居民有资格纳入研究并随机分为干预组(IG; n = 208)或对照组(CG; n = 174)。平均年龄(SD)为82.5(4.9)岁。干预:除常规护理外,IG的参与者还在AGU接受了基于CGA的护理。观察指标:主要结果是住院次数。次要结果是在医院和疗养院的天数,死亡率,公共卫生和社会护理的成本,参与者对护理的安全感以及与健康相关的生活质量(HRQoL)。结果:各组之间基线特征无差异。 IG(2.1)和CG(2.4)之间的住院次数没有差异,但IG的住院天数较少(11.1 vs 15.2; P = .035)。 IG表现出死亡率降低的趋势(危险比1.51; 95%置信区间[CI] 0.988-2.310; P = .057)和护理互动的安全感增强。 HRQoL没有差异。 IG和CG的成本分别为33,371英镑(39,947英镑)和30,490英镑(31,568英镑; P = .432)。结论和相关性:这项基于CGA的护理的研究是在非卧床护理环境中进行的,与之相反,在医院环境中进行的CGA效果研究的大部分则相反。这项研究证实了这种护理在住院天数和护理互动安全感方面对老年人的优越性,并且有可能在不增加成本的情况下向患有多种疾病的老年人转变为更易获得的护理。这项研究可以帮助规划老年人的未来干预措施。试验注册:clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT01446757。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号